October 22, 2025
Donald Trump Jr., executive vice president of the Trump Organization, has defended the privately funded renovation of the White House following widespread criticism and protests across the country. Speaking in a national interview, Trump Jr. said the new project, which includes the construction of a grand ballroom, is a necessary and functional upgrade that will serve future administrations without costing taxpayers any money.
According to Trump Jr., the project is being financed by private donations and by his father personally, describing it as an effort to modernize the White House’s capacity to host large official functions. He explained that the presidential residence is smaller than most people realize and that past presidents from both political parties have also overseen major renovations.
“It is privately funded by him and others. It is not costing the American taxpayer a dime. They are going to be the beneficiaries of that and of the successes and the incredible meetings that will be able to happen in the White House to celebrate America,” Trump Jr. said.
The remarks followed protests labeled “No Kings,” where demonstrators in several cities expressed opposition to the project and raised questions about transparency. Trump Jr. dismissed claims of corruption, saying that critics were motivated by partisanship and misinformation rather than evidence.
“The White House needs to be more functional and able to host major events,” he added. “This project will enhance the White House greatly and make it more functional. It is not for personal benefit but for the good of the country.”
Ethics experts have raised concerns about the lack of public disclosure regarding the renovation’s donors and oversight. They argue that privately funded construction on federal property could present potential conflicts of interest. Supporters, however, counter that private financing relieves the financial burden on taxpayers while improving national heritage sites.
The debate over the renovation highlights the continuing political divide in Washington. While allies view the project as a modernization effort for future generations, critics are calling for transparency and congressional review.
No official completion date has been confirmed, but sources close to the planning team said construction is expected to begin before the end of the year.
